AI Strategy & Roadmaps
Connect AI investments to business decisions, portfolio priorities, measurable outcomes, and responsible adoption — sequenced so each phase funds the next.
Solutions Overview
Advisory for leadership teams that need an AI roadmap tied to real decisions — with the governance, sequencing, and investment narrative to survive contact with the board.
The situation
Most enterprises are not short on AI activity. They are short on AI decisions — the small number of consequential choices that would turn scattered experimentation into operating advantage. Four patterns show up almost every time.
Initiatives are named after models, tools, and vendors. Nobody can point to the business decisions that would get faster, clearer, or more defensible if the work succeeded.
Promising proofs of concept never acquire an owner, a budget line, or an operating model. The demo lands; the transition to something that runs the business never gets designed.
Data, risk, and responsible-adoption questions surface after commitments are made — and stop the work at the most expensive possible moment.
The board hears capability, the operators hear disruption, and finance hears cost. Teams are deciding against different pictures of the same program.
The leadership imperative isn't to start with technology. It's to start with the decisions that move the business — and then build the AI capability that makes those decisions faster, clearer, and defensible.
Skip Vanderburg
The AI portfolio maps to a short list of business decisions, each with an owner.
Work is ordered by value, feasibility, and risk — with an investment narrative attached.
Data, risk, and responsible-use guardrails are designed in, not retrofitted at review.
Where I add value
Advisory grounded in building the thing, not just recommending it — across the operator, consultant, and founder seats.
Connect AI investments to business decisions, portfolio priorities, measurable outcomes, and responsible adoption — sequenced so each phase funds the next.
Design multi-agent approaches that synthesize evidence, compare scenarios, and improve executive decision velocity rather than adding another dashboard.
Align technology, operating models, customer experience, and cross-functional teams around change that scales past the first business unit.
Convert emerging-technology concepts into enterprise SaaS capabilities, working prototypes, and market-ready solutions with a credible delivery path.
Apply human-centered design and emerging technology to create differentiated products and services people actually adopt.
Translate complex AI concepts into clear choices, risks, governance priorities, and an investment narrative the board can act on.
Opportunities are ranked with established frameworks rather than intuition — RICE, MoSCoW, Eisenhower, scenario planning, risk assessment, and resource optimization — so the roadmap can be defended line by line to finance, risk, and the board.
How we work together
Scoped to the decision in front of you — from a single executive session to ongoing advisory alongside your leadership team.
A working session with your leadership team to establish a shared, non-hype view of what AI can and cannot do in your operating context — and where the real constraint sits.
A defined engagement that produces an AI roadmap tied to business decisions, prioritized with established frameworks rather than intuition, and sequenced against real capacity.
Retained advisory alongside your executive team — the senior AI perspective in the room, without adding a full-time role or a consulting bench.
Engagements are typically sized after a short scoping conversation; the briefing is often the fastest way to establish whether a sprint or a retained relationship is the right next step. Travel and expenses billed at cost.
Focus sectors
The advisory approach is industry-agnostic, but five sectors carry the combination of decision complexity, regulatory weight, and data fragmentation where getting past the pilot matters most.
Underwriting, claims, and distribution each run their own experiments. The portfolio view — what to fund, in what order, against which loss-ratio outcome — is missing.
Opening move · A single prioritized roadmap across underwriting, claims, and service, with a governance layer above it.
Clinical and administrative AI advance on separate tracks, and governance questions — privacy, clinical accountability, model oversight — arrive after the pilot has already been promised.
Opening move · Separate the decisions that carry clinical risk from the ones that don't, and sequence accordingly.
Model risk management and regulatory expectation set the pace, and ambitious AI programs stall waiting for a defensible control story.
Opening move · Build the governance and evidence trail into the roadmap rather than bolting it on at review.
No shortage of capability — the constraint is prioritization. Too many credible AI bets, too little agreement on which ones earn engineering capacity this year.
Opening move · Rank the portfolio with explicit frameworks so the trade-offs are visible and arguable.
Operational data is abundant and fragmented; AI initiatives cluster at the plant level and rarely aggregate into an enterprise capability.
Opening move · Identify the recurring enterprise decisions the plant data should be feeding, and build toward those.
Sector framing is a starting point, not a template. Every engagement begins with your operating context, the AI work already in flight, and the decisions your leadership team is actually trying to get right.
Background
Thirty-five years translating emerging technology into enterprise strategy, products, customer experiences, and operating advantage — at Fortune 500 companies, global consultancies, enterprise software firms, and as a founder building the thing itself.
Let's talk
If your team is weighing where to invest in AI — or trying to move from pilots to something that actually runs the business — a short conversation is usually the fastest way to find out whether I can help.